Just about anything can be fodder for an ideological dispute these days. Just consider news of the recent fire at Gene Cranick's home in Obion County, Tenn.
Here's the short version of what happened: In rural Obion County, homeowners must pay $75 annually for fire protection services from the nearby city of South Fulton. If they don't pay the fee and their home catches fire, tough luck -- even if firefighters are positioned just outside the home with hoses at the ready.
The incident has sparked a debate in many corners of the Web. Writers for the National Review, arguably the nation's most influential right-leaning voice, have seized on the episode to discuss the relative merits of compassionate conservatism versus a hard-line libertarianism.
But Foster's colleague Kevin Williamson
took the opposite view. Cranick's fellow residents in the rural stretches of Obion County had no fire protection until the county established the $75 fee in 1990. As Williamson explained: "The South Fulton fire department is being treated as though it has done something wrong, rather than having gone out of its way to make services available to people who did not have them before. The world is full of jerks, freeloaders, and ingrates — and the problems they create for themselves are their own. These free-riders have no more right to South Fulton's firefighting services than people in Muleshoe, Texas, have to those of NYPD detectives."
EXACTLY! Kevin Williamson nailed it. If the people of unincorporated portions Obion County don't pay taxes that support a FIRE DEPARTMENT, how can they expect to be made to put out fires? Fire departments and their crews are not cheap NOR are they FREE. In my home town, I pay property taxes for a police force and a fire brigade and other services provided.
When I was growing up my home town didn't have a fire department. It had a VOLUNTEER Fire Department. It was just that, volunteers with old military trucks with 500 gallon tanks in the bed. And they would come out and watch your house burn to the ground while they figured out how to use the PTO on the 1954 M35 converted fire truck attempt to put out your house fire.
They are well meaning folks and many rural areas of Oklahoma rely on these brave men who risk their lives for NOTHING. Maybe these residents in Tennessee should start their own rural fire department, volunteer to respond 24 hours a day 365 days a year, and learn in their spare time how to put out structure fires using 30 year old worn out fire trucks. No, they should pay the pittance of 75$ a year for fire service. If enough of their residents pay, perhaps in a few year they may even put a fire station out there for quicker response.
As for those who would say resident X wanted to pay the 75$ at the time of the fire and the department should have taken the money and put out the fire, I say this, "Really? Do you think it only costs 75$ to put out a house fire?"
You have an option at the time you purchase your home. Buy fire service or don't. If you choose not to purchase you should decide to insure your home HEAVILY. It will burn down, to the ground, and it might threaten your neighbor's property and you may be responsible for that as well.
The short of it is. If the fire department puts this guy's fire out for 75$, EVERYONE will wait until their home is on fire to pay the 75$. That doesn't help the fire department budget or plan for services in these areas. If that is what the people in this UNSERVED area want, give them the actual response cost and expect payment before services are rendered.
911 what is your emergency?
My house is on fire!
What is your address sir?
123 Bumfug Egypt Road.
A fire department service call for that location will be 23,542 dollars. How did you plan to pay for the services?
Visa.
I'm ready to take your credit card number now sir....